Here's what I've been thinking. It's no doubt that there are more than 48 acts that really have good talent - I mean, they are really good at what they do. Thus, they don't end up making it to the top 48, despite how good they are at their act, or even how good they think they are. I like it when said acts say how hard they've worked, or that they think they did a great job and should go through to the next round. Here's the sad reality: They may be very good at their acts and be quite talented, but you're sent home because you act is boring...at least to the majority of people. You can be the best in the world at something, or close to it, and still not be very entertaining at all. This fact is even more evident in the semi-finals and finals, where great acts are sent home when they think they should stay. Well, they lose to acts that entertain more, not always which ones are more talented. The show should be called, "America's Got Entertaining Talent". I mean, c'mon! You're competing for a show is Vegas! You talent has to be entertaining! You can be a great singer, but be terrible at choosing songs or "owning the stage". You can be a great dance group but have a narrow variety of different of moves. You can have an incredible artistic talent, but just can't make it exciting. So, that's what annoys me about the show, especially since people should've figured it out by now after 7 seasons.
Take care and value music.
No comments:
Post a Comment